Do You Have To Register Guns In Texas

If They Come for Your Guns, Exercise You Accept a Responsibility to Fight?

Friday, March xviii, 2022 xiv:37

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

I feel a tremendous responsibleness to write this article though I am a niggling apprehensive. Thinking most the possibility of ascent up against our ain regime is a frightening affair for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the commencement to admit that I exercise not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, still, is only because I don't call up the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens experience similar they have no choice just to give up their guns if the government comes for them. I arraign traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I deport the responsibility of all small contained bloggers to tell the truth. And then my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights equally an American, and let you determine what to do with those rights.

A Pound Of This Gives Your Body Everything You Need & With Promo Code SONSOFLIBERTY Yous'll Save $$$
Pull Your Kids From Public Schools & Educate Them Yourself
How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
Here'south A Way You Can Stockpile Nutrient For The Future
Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Hither's One Elementary Way To Detoxify

About a calendar month ago I let the "republic" word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It's not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to draw our grade of authorities. The truth is that the The states is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a commonwealth because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans desire something that goes against our founding principles, they have no correct to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might cull to call back of it this way… Say that members of your congregation determine that mass fornication is a good affair. Do they accept the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. Information technology doesn't matter how many people endeavour to stray from information technology. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but delight note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote information technology are much like God is to believers. Information technology is the police force. It is indisputable.

Our founders did non desire a "democracy" for they feared a true commonwealth was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was prepare to help limit abuse of government and as well the potential for an "immoral majority" developing inside the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.

Why is a commonwealth potentially just every bit unsafe as a monarchy? Let's wait at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well-armed lamb battling the vote. -Benjamin Franklin

Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that republic was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country tin can become simply as corrupt as whatsoever government.We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population tin can get corrupt.

I remember in 2012 nosotros are seeing show of what Franklin was trying to tell the states. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not hateful that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because almost Americans dearest our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go confronting our ramble rights.

Adjacent I'd like to review the text of the 2nd amendment. It is very articulate. This is the police of this land. And then when Senator Feinstein or President Obama talk about taking your guns, yous need to remember almost something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to go along and deport Arms, shall not be infringed.

This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment considering it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to have this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you desire to research this decision further you can start here.

For those who endeavour to debate the spirit of the second amendment, they are truly no different from people who volition try to have Biblical quotes out of context to effort to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the second amendment. Permit me share a few quick quotes hither:

The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and behave arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson

Firearms stand up next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone nether independence … From the 60 minutes the Pilgrims landed, to the nowadays 24-hour interval, events, occurrences, and tendencies testify that to insure peace, security and happiness, the burglarize and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of accolade with all that is skillful. -George Washington

The Constitution shall never exist construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. -Samuel Adams

I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the correct to conduct arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his regime or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who vox their opinions confronting this right have their gratuitous speech protected past your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments go zip and void, simply because "We the People" will lose our ability of enforcement.

We need to keep this in mind as our "representatives" try to push button gun bans. I don't intendance if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and unproblematic.

A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the second amendment, I would nevertheless be within my rights to phone call upon it. Yous would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, only in the cease I would exist the only truthful American among the states.

Our framers were very clear on this. If my regime comes to have my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered past the 2nd amendment.

Information technology is not my correct, at that point, but my responsibleness to respond in the name of liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft sell, and many others have tried to avert putting into print, but I am going to say it. The fourth dimension for speaking in code is over.

If they come up for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet nether. You lot have the right to kill any representative of this authorities who tries to tread on your freedom. I am thinking about self-defense and non talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson'due south quote. He talks about a "last resort." I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense force. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may take to talk about that as well. None of us wants to recall well-nigh that, but please understand that a majority can non take away your rights as an American citizen. Just you tin choose to surrender your rights.

Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it simply would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason nosotros take a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Courtroom can also become decadent, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the bulk supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every unmarried citizen, no matter what their "elected servants" say. A majority in America but matters when the constitution is not in play.

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of voice communication is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and information technology could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. Information technology is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell y'all again.If they come for your guns it is your right to employ those guns confronting them and to kill them. Y'all are protected past our constitution.

Most of the articles I am reading on the subject area are trying to give you lot clues without just coming out and saying information technology. I sympathize that considering certain things in this land will become yous on a listing that y'all don't want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small-scale and growing so I may not be at that place yet, but I have dreams. I likewise take my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

I am not the "subversive" here, information technology is the political representatives who are threatening to have abroad my inalienable rights. If they come to accept my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or expressionless, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison house and may face an execution. Just I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

If I go down fighting and so I was non fighting to damage these man beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. Information technology is self-defense and information technology is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. Nosotros would not be ruled by a tyrannical authorities in the 1770'south and nosotros will not exist ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical authorities. In that location is no difference.

This is a case of correct and wrong. As of now the second amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack take a problem with the constitution so they should be removed from function. They are not defending the constitution which they accept sworn an adjuration to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos.

I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I tin make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. ii%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

What I do know is that this state was founded by people who had balls the size of Texas and Patriotic Americans have shit off of no one, particularly our own authorities. For evidence of that, you might inquiry the Revolutionary State of war. My question is how many Patriots are left?

I would promise that our officials come up to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making u.s.a. make up one's mind if we desire to die free or submit to their rule. I can non tell you lot where you lot should stand on that. I do know that information technology may make the deviation betwixt living a life of freedom or slavery.

You must start thinking about this considering I believe that the twenty-four hour period is coming soon and I personally believe information technology has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that y'all ready yourself to react.

I mean no boldness to our elected officials only they need to understand that "We the People" will not be disarmed. If they proceed then information technology is they that are provoking us and we will deed accordingly. We are inside our rights to do so.

For those who are in support of taking the guns, you demand to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not only talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you accept called your side.

Are yous willing to dice to accept my guns?

Important UPDATE From Dean Garrison!!!When this mail service originally went viral I was trying to respond every single comment and that lasted for almost 48 hours. Then I came to grips with the fact that I am human and I can't practice it. If for no other reason I value my family unit and I can't steal fourth dimension from them to constantly be on the site. I want you all to know that I appreciate your support and practiced debate whether you agree or disagree. I also want to thank each and every American Patriot who has fabricated the honorable selection to serve their country.Anyone who wants to repost this on their blog or website is as well given permission to do so, so long as nothing is changed in the text of the article, and a link is provided back to this site. Again, thank you so much. I am humbled. Information technology's now sixteen days later and this is still the about popular post on our blog. Go along fighting for what is right. We must stand up united. -Dean Garrison ane-20-xiii

Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison